The Georgia High School Association’s plan to expand from five to six classifications is a “done deal” after a minor tweak on Monday.

The original legislation, which was narrowly approved last May, remains basically the same for dividing the GHSA’s 443 member high school into six classifications for athletic competition. The minor change for the expansion, which will take effect in August 2012, was to allow the GHSA a little leeway in dividing the percentage of schools in each classification by 1-2 percentage points.

“Six classifications is a done deal; that is correct,” said Ralph Swearngin, the GHSA’s executive director.

Soon after GHSA’s Executive Committee began on Monday, it voted to rescind the same Reclassification legislation that passed last May. However, it was only for tweaking purposes. While the Executive Committee took a brief recess, the Reclassification Committee quickly worked out a compromise that it approved with a unanimous voice vote. It was then presented to the Executive Committee which also passed it unanimously.

It was a stark contrast to last May’s GHSA meeting, when the expansion from five to six classification passed by the narrowest of margins with a 26-24 vote.

“The compromise was to stay with six classifications, but to slightly change the percentages so we could address schools that may have geographical or travel challenges, and also to get better balance after some schools choose to move up and play in a higher classification,” Swearngin said.

Under the previous plan, Class AAAAAA, AAAAA, AAAA, AAA, and AA would each consist of between 15 and 16 percent of the state’s overall high schools, along with 22 percent of Class A. On Monday, everybody but Class A will have between a 14-17 percentage of schools. Class A will stay around 22 percent because there are many non-football playing schools.

“That’s what we asked for, for them to have enough confidence to give us some leeway,” said Dave Hunter, the former Brookwood football coach who is on the GHSA’s Reclassification Committee. “What we don’t want is to have 17 percent in most of the classes, and then come back with 12 percent in another.

“There was a lot of cooperation from everybody. Now, no one can say that the Class AAAAAA guys can do this, while Class AAAA can get away with this other thing. It’s all set up in advance.”

Also, Region 2-A’s proposal to challenge the legality of last May’s Reclassification vote was dropped on Monday after that particular legislation was rescinded and sent back to the subcommittee.

Monday’s biggest surprise was tabling the proposal to divide Class A between schools located in urban and rural areas in an effort to balance competition. It was good news for the proposal’s supporters. Had it been voted upon on Monday, it would’ve liked failed due to the Executive Committee’s unfamiliarity with it.

“People want to know more about it,” Swearngin said. “Obviously, it would be easy to say ‘I don’t know about it so I am going to vote against it.’ But they are keeping the door open on that one.”

The urban-rural Class A proposal will be discussed again by the Reclassification Committee on Sept. 13. If approved, it will be presented in front of the Executive Committee in a specially-called meeting in October.

Also, the GHSA discussed the policy for hot weather conditions after the deaths of two high school football players who collapsed after practices earlier this month. Several board members expressed concerns and ideas, while the Executive Committee will wait until next January or later to take any action after reviewing medical data from a three-year scientific study by the University of Georgia.

Similar Posts:

Share